This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
downloads:cryolo_1 [2019/07/11 09:55] twagner [crYOLO boxmanager] |
downloads:cryolo_1 [2019/07/11 11:27] twagner [General PhosaurusNet models] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
[[pipeline: | [[pipeline: | ||
- | === For cryo images (neural network denoised) === | + | === For cryo images (neural network denoised |
Number of datasets: 38 real, 10 simulated, 10 particle free datasets on various grids with contamination | Number of datasets: 38 real, 10 simulated, 10 particle free datasets on various grids with contamination | ||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
[[pipeline: | [[pipeline: | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | The performance of the general model based on JANNI denoised data compared to low-pass filtered data did not improve. The average AUC on the validation data was in both cases the same (0.85). But this might be because of the data selected for the general model. I assume that especially on very noisy micrographs JANNI will improve the results. | ||
+ | </ | ||