This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
downloads:cryolo_1 [2019/05/03 15:45] twagner [crYOLO] |
downloads:cryolo_1 [2019/05/16 13:09] twagner [crYOLO] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
* < | * < | ||
* < | * < | ||
+ | * Issue 21: The search range for filament tracing is too low for many datasets. To check if you are affected: Use your trained model and pick without the filament options. Check if your filaments a nicely picked (many consecutive boxes on a filament). In the next version, the search range will be increased and added as an optional parameter. | ||
+ | * Issue 22: If absolute paths are used in the field " | ||
Line 159: | Line 161: | ||
====crYOLO==== | ====crYOLO==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | **crYOLO 1.3.6:** | ||
+ | * Changed filament search radius factor from 0.8 to 1.41 (this fixed issue 21) | ||
+ | * Add search radius factor as parameter (-sr) during prediction in filament mode | ||
+ | * Improved error message in case of corrupted config file | ||
+ | * Fixed issue 22: If absolute paths are used in the field “train_image” in your configuration file, filtering is skipped. | ||
+ | |||
**crYOLO 1.3.5:** | **crYOLO 1.3.5:** | ||
* Fixed issue 20: During training the images are normalized separately, but during prediction is done batch wise. The lead to confusing results: some micrographs were perfectly picked, some totally unreasonable, | * Fixed issue 20: During training the images are normalized separately, but during prediction is done batch wise. The lead to confusing results: some micrographs were perfectly picked, some totally unreasonable, |